I would say it shows promise, but considering it's primary motive is money then NO, it does not. Thanks to Bitsdjour for this offer, but there are several things I don't like about Speedconnect, first and foremost is the fact that it adds an entry to your startup to where it is loaded as a process but that process is not apparent to those who don't check. At least that is the best explanation I can give, although I am no tech or nothing like that, I just know it helped me out a lot. Page loading times are not necessarily a PC issue in my point of view, see, my settings were limiting the amount of data "A safe settings setup" that could be processed at one time, using TCP it opened up the stream for the page loads. As for accessing sites, that would be a DNS issue. Like I said earlier there really was no speed change but I am using a high speed fiber connection, the only change with TCP was the fact that it opened up speedy changes with video connection loads and page viewing load times. So there was a definite change in that aspect. Now after using TCP it goes straight into HD when viewing those videos. I can tell you this much, I go to a lot of sports forums and I am currently using Google Chrome 64 Bit, when I would load Videos "Before using TCP Optimizer" I could start watching them and it would start out kinda blurry with the connection for about 40-50 seconds and then go into HD with this browser. One big thing about TCP I noticed was that you need to make sure you select the proper device to change or optimize, in my case I have blue tooth/wifi and ethernet, if you don't do that or make sure from the start then nothing will change for what you use. I know it's not the latest generation of i7 processors, but I have only had it for like a month and a half or so and bought it new. Serious Noize Collins, I actually am using a very new PC, it's a Dell XPS 8700 with 16 GB's of ram and a 4th generation i7 processor.
0 kommentar(er)
